Legal Opinion
Fladung v. City of Boulder
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 18, 1966No. 21705PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
We refer to plaintiff in error as plaintiff and to defendant in error as defendant.
The plaintiff, by his complaint, challenged the validity of Ordinance No. 2880 adopted by the city council of Boulder, Colorado, on December 15, 1964, creating Local Improvement District No. 7A. The purpose for which the district was created was that of constructing certain street and storm sewer improvements in the area included therein. It was alleged in the complaint that:
“Said ordinance was not published in final form in a daily newspaper of the City of Boulder, Colorado at least ten days, or at any other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shields v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Van Kleeck v. RamerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- In re Senate Resolution No. 4Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Tanner v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fladung v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Enger v. WALKER FIELD, COLO. PUBLIC AIRPORT AUTH.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- McCray v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- TCD North, Inc. v. City Council of City of Greenwood VillageColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Artcarved Class Rings, Inc. v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.