Legal Opinion

Tanner v. City of Boulder

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 13, 1965No. 21318PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McWilliams

Tanner and Quinby, as residents and taxpayers of the city of Boulder and on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, brought an action against the city of Boulder and certain of its officials, seeking invalidation of a completed annexation by Boulder of certain undeveloped land owned by one Hindry. The trial court upon hearing granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, holding that Tanner and Quinby were not “aggrieved persons” within the meaning of C.R.S. ’53, 139-11-6, and that accordingly they had no standing to institute the instant proceeding. Upon review this court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beshore v. Town of Bel AirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. City of Colorado Springs v. Kitty Hawk Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Greenberg v. LEEOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Nelson v. FarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Tanner v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Brookeville Turnpike Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. GERALNES BV v. City of Greenwood Village, Colo.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
  3. Fladung v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Brookeville Turnpike Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API