Van Kleeck v. Ramer
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court. Hon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Chirk Justice Gabbert
delivered the opinion of the court:
The ultimate -question is whether the declaration by the general assembly that the act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety, is conclusive that it is a statute which excepts it from the referendum. In re Senate Resolution, 54 Colo. 262, 130 Pac. 333, in response to questions propounded by the senate, we said with respect to the constitutional provision, which recites that the power reserved, designated the referendum, “may be ordered except as to laws necessary for the immediate preservation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Oklahoma City v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Attorney General ex rel. Barbour v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- McClure v. NyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Shields v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Firelock Inc. v. District Court in & for the 20th Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Lyman v. Town of Bow MarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- McKee v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- State ex rel. Goodman v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1920
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.