Artcarved Class Rings, Inc. v. City of Austin
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McCLOUD, Chief Justice.
The question presented is whether a declaration that an “emergency” exists in a city ordinance is binding on the courts and not subject to review.
Plaintiff, Artcarved Class Rings, Inc., sought to enjoin the City of Austin from enforcing Annexation Ordinance No. 75-1231-C as an emergency measure and requested the court to declare the ordinance void as an emergency measure because it did not properly relate to the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety. The court denied plaintiff’s requests for relief and in its conclusions of law held that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Day Land & Cattle Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Biggs v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Western Heights Land Corp. v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- IDAHO STATE AFL-CIO v. LeroyIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- IDAHO STATE AFL-CIO v. LeroyIdaho Supreme Court · 1986