Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Pierce County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 9, 1997No. 19643-3-IIPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
The City of Buckley and the Buckley Plateau Coalition appeal Pierce County’s issuance of a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) and a Conditional Use Permit to RPW Industries, Inc. Buckley contends that (1) the Hearing Examiner’s decision to uphold the MDNS was "clearly erroneous,” and (2) the Hearing Examiner erred in finding no violation of an Urban Area Agreement between Pierce County and the City of Buckley. RPW Industries and Pierce County contend that (1) Buckley does not have standing to challenge the MDNS, and (2) they are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Save a Valuable Environment v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Schofield v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Knight v. City of YelmWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Suquamish Indian Tribe v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- City of Federal Way v. Town & Country Real Estate, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.