Legal Opinion

Zank v. Larson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 5, 1996No. C3-95-1132PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

We determine whether statutory immunity under the discretionary function exception of Minn.Stat. § 466.03, subd. 6 (1994) applies to a determination by the City of St. Paul as to the sequence of traffic control signals at an intersection within the city limits. Following an accident at an intersection controlled by the city, respondent Darlene Zank sued respondent Gary Larson and appellant the City of St. Paul, alleging that Larson was negligent in failing to yield the right of way at the intersection and that the city was negligent in maintaining defective traffic…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit OperationsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Graber v. City of AnkenySupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  3. Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Fear v. Independent School District 911Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Angell v. Hennepin County Regional Rail AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API