Johnston v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Washington County; A. T. 'Humeml, Judge. Action by A. Chapman and another against H. 6. Johnston and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action upon an account stated, commenced by the defendants in error, plaintiffs below, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiffs, upon which judgment was rendered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.
The first assignment of error is to the effect that the court erred in overruling an objection to the introduction of any testimony, upon the ground that the petition does not state faets^ sufficient to constitute a cause of action. After setting out the allegation claimed to be defective counsel…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Marshall v. HomierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sulsberger & Sons Co. v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Abbott v. DingusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hunt v. Tulsa Terrazzo & Mosaic Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- First Bank of Texola v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Taylor v. StarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.