Legal Opinion

Sulsberger & Sons Co. v. Castleberry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 17, 1914No. 4267PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John J. Carney, Judge. Action by W. F. Castleberry against the Sulzberger & Sons Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, hereinafter called the plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, hereinafter called the defendant, to recover the sum of $10,000 as damages resulting from a personal injury alleged to have been received by the plaintiff while in the defendant’s employment. The answer set up a general denial, and alleged contributory negligence and assumption of risk. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,300, upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. SchermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Blackert v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Kali Inla Coal Co. v. GhinelliSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API