Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Starr

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 24, 1924No. 13263PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

FOSTER, C.

This action was commenced in the district count of Oklahoma county, Okla., by Wm. B. Starr and Charles Little, defendants in error, plaintiffs below, against Joe Taylor and John Sparks, plaintiffs in error, defendants below, to recover the sum of $1,251.27, alleged to be due them on a verified account. The parties will hereinafter he referred ‘toi as they appeared in ithe trial court. ;

I-t was ‘the claim of the plaintiffs that said balance wias due them from tbe defendants on account of certain losses which they bad sustained in certain transactions conducted upon the New…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Gettys v. NewburgerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. Young v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Mooney v. First State Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Avery v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Dick v. EssarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Roger Givens, Inc. v. Mustex, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Wilson Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Kansas, Okla. & Gulf Ry. Co. v. BallewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API