Watterson v. Owens River Canal Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Inyo County and from an order refusing a new trial. Wm. D. Dehy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
In the superior court, the action of the plaintiff Watterson and a separate action of the other plaintiffs, against the same defendant, were consolidated. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff Watterson and in favor of certain other plaintiffs, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, the defendant appeals.
On December 30, 1908, P. N. Snyder and C. A. Collins entered into a Avritten contract with the Hillside Water Company and the Owens River Canal Company, whereby the contractors agreed to perform the excavation work required by certain specifications, for the purpose…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Laidlaw v. MaryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Ausplund v. &198tna Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Condon v. DonohueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Kiessig v. AllspaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Southern Surety Co. v. Sealy Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Howard v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- W. H. Putegnat Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Wells v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Mazzera v. RamseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.