Condon v. Donohue
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment, and enter a judgment for defendant upon a cross-complaint. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
The plaintiff, a building contractor, brought this action to recover an amount alleged to be due as the reasonable value of labor and materials furnished in the construction of a building at the comer of Hayes and Gough streets in San Francisco. The defendant relied on the claim that all of the same were furnished in pursuance of a written contract between the parties for the construction of such building for thirty three thousand dollars, that plaintiff abandoned his contract without completing the same and that he was compelled to finish the same at his own expense at a cost, reasonably…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Rahmel v. LehndorffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Laidlaw v. MaryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Stimson Mill Company v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Sullivan v. California Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Prince v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- California Delta Farms, Inc. v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Pomper v. BehnkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Jameson v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Offeman v. Robertson-Cole Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.