Legal Opinion
Mazzera v. Ramsey
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1925No. Docket No. 2828PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The plaintiff, as owner, and George Balliet, as contractor, entered into a building contract containing the following provisions material to the determination of this appeal:
“Whereas, the said owner is desirous that the hereinafter mentioned one story bungalow building No. 841 be built, erected and fully completed for the sum of . . . $7,516.50, free and clear from all liens and claims of liens, and of any and every other claim and demand . . . and
“Whereas, the said contractor with knowledge of the premises, is ready, able and willing to furnish all labor and materials and to do and fully…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ausplund v. &198tna Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. MoxleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Bateman Brothers v. MapelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Dunne Investment Co. v. Empire State Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Watterson v. Owens River Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- English v. Olympic Auditorium, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Barrientos v. Gobierno de la CapitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
- Caron v. AndrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Howard v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.