Legal Opinion
Cairnes v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 8, 1955No. 260-52; No. 213-52; No. 261-52; No. 258-52; No. 237-52; No. 285-52; No. 308-52; No. 238-52; No. 239-52; No. 240-52; No. 259-52; No. 241-52PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLaramoke, Judge
Plaintiffs, all retired officers of the United States CoastGuard, claim additional retired pay.
Each plaintiff served over 40 years in the United States Coast Guard and upon retirement was placed on the retired list at a rank one grade above that held at retirement.
Plaintiffs, Cairnes, Dempwolf, Fisher, Maccoun, Munter, Manyon, Nichols, Porcher, Sexton and Wheeler, were each advanced on retirement to Eear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, Eetired, from the permanently held rank of *778Captain, the highest rank in which each of them had served on active duty. Plaintiff, Lincoln was advanced to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Kimberly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Hottel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Shanley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tracy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. SiegelNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Tracy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Tracy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956