Legal Opinion

Tracy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1956No. 113-55Published

1Opinion of the Court

142 F.Supp. 943 (1956)

Louis Standish TRACY

v.

The UNITED STATES.

No. 113-55.

United States Court of Claims.

June 5, 1956.

Harry E. Wood, Washington, D. C., Ansell & Ansell, Washington, D. C., on the briefs, for plaintiff.

Alfred H. O. Boudreau, Jr., Washington, D. C., George Cochran Doub, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and LARAMORE, Judges.

MADDEN, Judge.

The issue is the rate of pay which plaintiff, a retired Army officer, is entitled to receive. He was retired May 1, 1950, for physical disability, his rate of retired pay being 60 percent of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  2. Tracy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Fredrickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. Alger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Kimberly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API