Legal Opinion

Tracy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1956No. 113-55PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The issue is the rate of pay which plaintiff, a retired Army officer, is entitled to receive. He was retired May 1, 1950, for physical disability, his rate of retired pay being 60 percent of the basic pay of a lieutenant colonel with over 26 years’ service, pursuant to Title IV of the Career Compensation Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 802, 37 U.S.C.A. § 271 et seq.

Plaintiff claims that, since he was serving on active duty in the temporary rank of lieutenant colonel, but at that time he held the permanent rank of a colonel in the Officers’ Reserve Corps, he should have been retired at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  2. Fredrickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Kimberly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  4. Cairnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arthur T. Broche v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Lowell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Budd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Jakway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  5. Neri v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API