Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tracy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1956No. 113-55Published

1DissentJones, Chief Judge

I agree that plaintiff should have been retired at the rate of 75 percent of his pay as a lieutenant colonel, the highest rank in which he ever actually served. It is true that after he was called into the Federal service and was appointed a lieutenant colonel in the Army of the United States he was tendered and accepted a permanent appointment as a colonel in the Officers’ Reserve Corps, but he continued to serve as a lieutenant colonel in the Army of the United States, and he never had a minute’s actual service as a colonel, and at no time served in a higher rank than that of lieutenant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Kimberly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  3. Hottel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  5. Shanley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API