Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Siegel
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.
Plaintiff, a manufacturer of photographic equipment and supplies, brought this action for a permanent injunction pursuant to the so-called Feld-Crawford ‘‘ Fair Trade Law ’’ (General Business Law, §§ 369-a-369-e ; L. 1935, ch. 976, as amd., re-enacted by L. 1940, ch. 195, § 3). Applications for a preliminary injunction were previously denied (207 Misc. 283, Matthew M. Levy, J.; 207 Misc. 986, Steuer, J.).
The complaint alleges the existence, known to the defendant, of a fair-trade agreement with respect to the minimum retail resale prices of certain of the plaintiff’s products and the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bourjois Sales Corp. v. DorfmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Lilly Co. v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- General Electric Co. v. Masters, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gillette Company v. Two Guys From Harrison, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Company, a Body Corporate, and Cross-Appellee v. Home Utilities Company, Incorporated, a Body Corporate, and CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Eastman Kodak Company v. Home Utilities CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- Parke, Davis & Co. v. Amalgamated Health & Drug Plan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Lanvin Parfums, Inc. v. Le Dans, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960