Schriber v. Town of Langlade
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEALS from the Circuit Court for Langlade County. The facts will sufficiently appear from the opinions. They contended, inter alia, that the present town of Langlade is liable upon the orders in suit. The temporary, provisional annexation to the town of Polar did not affect the liability. Ryan v. Evans, 49 Tex. 364; Midland v. Roscommon, 39 Mich. 424; Clark v. Goss, 12 Tex. 395; Haynes v. Washington Co. 19 Ill- 66; State ex rel.
Read the full summary
APPEALS from the Circuit Court for Langlade County. The facts will sufficiently appear from the opinions. They contended, inter alia, that the present town of Langlade is liable upon the orders in suit. The temporary, provisional annexation to the town of Polar did not affect the liability. Ryan v. Evans, 49 Tex. 364; Midland v. Roscommon, 39 Mich. 424; Clark v. Goss, 12 Tex. 395; Haynes v. Washington Co. 19 Ill- 66; State ex rel. Wise v. Button, 25 "Wis. 109. The pretended merger with the town of Eichmond does not relieve it. (1) There is no proof of such merger. The ordinance was not…
1Opinion of the Court
Upon the appeal by the defendant the following opinion was filed:
Taylou, J.
The respondent brought his action against the present town of Langlade, to recover the amount of *619certain town orders set out in his complaint, and which he alleges were lawfully issued by said town, as the same was organized in 1880 and 1881 at the time said orders were issued. He also alleges that he has duly presented said orders to the treasurer of said town for payment, and that payment -was refused, and therefore demands judgment, etc.
The answer admits that Icznglade is a duly organized town, and that it was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Langford v. MonteithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Thompson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Smith v. SherryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Inhabitants of Hampshire v. Inhabitants of FranklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re Sanitary Bd. of E. Fruitvale Sanitary Dist.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Grunert v. SpaldingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- King v. McAndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Henshaw v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.