Woodward v. Fruitvale Sanitary District
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is a controversy submitted to the court below upon an agreed statement of facts, as provided for by section 1138 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Judgment was rendered in favor of the sanitary district, and Woodward appeals.
The proceeding was initiated by F. J. Woodward, a taxpayer within the Fruitvale Sanitary District, to test the validity of the organization of such district, and the legality of certain bonds issued by the sanitary board, as well as the validity of a tax levied by said sanitary board upon property in said district.
The Fruitvale Sanitary District was organized…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Central Irrigation District v. De LappeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Turlock Irrigation District v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Hawes v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- In Re Sanitary Bd. of E. Fruitvale Sanitary Dist.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Schulte v. FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Pixley v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.