Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Swackhamer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1886No. 11,978PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J. —

There is no dispute concerning the facts which gave rise to this suit. The question is upon which of two innocent persons the law will cast the loss occasioned by the operations of one who, by the successful execution of a fraudulent scheme, obtained wrongful possession of property, which was afterwards sold by commission men, to whom it was delivered for sale by the person who was fraudulently in possession of it.

On the 12th day of November, 1883, Swackhamer, a farmer residing in Clinton county, in this State, was the owner of forty head of cattle. A man, calling himself…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hills v. SnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Curme, Dunn & Co. v. RauhIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Parrish v. ThurstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Breckenridge v. McAfeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Grunson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Moore v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Porter v. RosemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Fleming v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
  5. Moore v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API