Legal Opinion
Moore v. Moore
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1887No. 13,711PublishedCited by 21 opinions
From the Clark Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was a suit by Robert W. Moore against William and Kate Lee to foreclose a mortgage executed by the latter as a security for the payment of five promissory notes, payable by the mortgagors to Louis Schneck, guardian of Charles H. Moore, a person of unsound mind.
As appears from the complaint, the notes were endorsed by Schneck to Mary A. Moore, and by her to James E. Moore, and by the latter to the plaintiff, Robert W. Moore.
The appellant, Mary A. Moore, upon her intervening petition, was admitted a party defendant. She thereupon filed a cross-complaint, in which she alleged tliat the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Bush v. . LathropNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Weaver v. . BardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Moore v. . Metropolitan National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Trustees of Union College v. WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gardner v. Beacon Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Bank of Bristol v. B. O.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
- Kiefer v. KlinsickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- New Albany National Bank v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Levi v. KraminerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.