Porter v. Roseman
Indiana Supreme Court
From Tipton Circuit Court; J. F. Elliott, Judge. Action by Abraham Roseman against Robert L. Porter. From a decree denying a part of defendant’s set-off, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
This is an ordinary action by appellee against appellant, on an open account for goods sold and delivered. Answer in set-off. Reply said to be by general denial, but it is not in the record. Special findings, conclusion of law, and judgment in favor of appellee. The evidence is not in the record. The question for decision arises upon the conclusion of law and motion to modify the judgment.
The special findings disclose the following facts: Prior to the commencement of this action there was owing the plaintiff (appellee), a resident of New York, from the appellant, $249, for goods sold and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Glascock v. LyonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Bank of Antigo v. Union Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Quick v. LemonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Alexander v. SwackhamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- KMK Factoring, L.L.C. v. McKnew (In Re McKnew)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Cole v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Hall v. Wilder Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Cole v. . WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Shotwell v. Sioux Falls Savings BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.