Legal Opinion

Grunson v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,917PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Criminal Court of Marion County.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Appellants were jointly tried and convicted of the crime of larceny. It appears from the evidence that Thomas H. Combs was a passenger on a railway train, having entered it at Chicago; that Grunson had taken and was sitting in a seat with Combs; that shortly before the train reached the city Smith entered the car and was introduced by Grunson to Combs, under the name of Adams; that he represented himself as an express agent; that Grunson had previously introduced himself to Combs as Mr. Harper, and had informed him that he was engaged in the business of buying and shipping furs, and had some…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Badger v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  2. Smith v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  4. Welsh v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Hildebrand v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Alexander v. SwackhamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State v. LoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Fleming v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State v. GermainOregon Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API