Legal Opinion
Britts v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 2006No. H030560PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUFFY, J.
In this original proceeding, we address whether the stay on “[a]ll discovery proceedings” (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16, subd. (g)) 1 imposed upon the filing of an anti-SLAPP 2 motion extends to discovery motions. The proceeding arises by petition for a writ of mandate directing the superior court to vacate its order (1) granting real party plaintiff’s motion to compel production of documents and the occurrence of a deposition; (2) finding a waiver of petitioners’ objections to the discovery; and (3) imposing sanctions of $5,000 for the petitioners’ failure to have responded to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. Costco Wholesale Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- New Albertsons, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Joannou v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Tucker v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Haniff v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.