Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Schembri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 15, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as a manager at a coffee shop restaurant following a confrontation with her supervisor. Substantial evidence in the record supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant’s conduct constituted disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Tietze [Hudacs], 193 AD2d 1000). Claimant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of TietzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of KushnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PasquarosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of MercurioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of De La ConchaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. In re the Claim of JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API