Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Tietze
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 20, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 28, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant’s supervisor testified that she asked claimant to sign a written warning regarding her work performance on her last day of work. While the supervisor was explaining the warning to claimant, claimant took the warning from her hands, "yelled that it was a lie and ripped it in half and threw it on the floor and then stormed out of the office”. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of PadillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Claim of ValentinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Claim of NunesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of SchembriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of Rey-CalderonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of De La ConchaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of MaggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.