Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 21, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

*803Appeal from, a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 20, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as an assistant rehabilitation specialist with a special needs organization until she was discharged for making unprofessional comments to her supervisor in the presence of a consumer. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits upon a finding that she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SchembriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of VindigniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of HooghkirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API