Legal Opinion

Murray v. Laugsand

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 30, 2002No. 98-CV-00132; A107950PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment granting plaintiffs’ claim for reformation of a deed. Most prominently, defendants assign error to the trial court’s conclusion that plaintiffs’ negligence in failing to detect an unacceptable provision in the deed before closing the parties’ transaction was insufficient to preclude reformation based on plaintiffs’ unilateral mistake. Defendants also assign error to the trial court’s award of attorney fees to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, assigning error to the trial court’s dismissal of their claim for specific performance of a settlement agreement…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jensen v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Kontz v. B. P. John Furniture Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Southworth v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Wolfgang v. Henry Thiele Catering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Criterion Interests, Inc. v. Deschutes ClubCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pioneer Resources, LLC v. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Sumerel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Illinois National Insurance v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. RIVERSIDE HOMES, INC. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Kish v. KusturaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API