Legal Opinion

RIVERSIDE HOMES, INC. v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 12, 2009No. C053944CV; A135387PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*294ARMSTRONG, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendants seeking specific performance of a land sale contract. At the close of plaintiffs case-in-chief, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for judgment of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to ORCP 54 B(2), but awarded plaintiff $136,024.66 as reimbursement for development costs expended by plaintiff during the pendency of the sale of the land. In a supplemental judgment, the court further determined that defendants, as the prevailing parties, were entitled to an award of attorney fees, costs, and disbursements in the amount of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. In re the Marriage of CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. City of Eugene v. MonacoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Case v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Nietzche v. Freedom Home Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
  4. Patrick Allen v. Familycare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. RIVERSIDE HOMES, INC. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API