Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Miller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1977No. TC 75-446-E, SC 24687PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

Plaintiffs sued to quiet title to a strip of land. Defendants counterclaimed for reformation of the contract and deed by which plaintiffs had conveyed to the defendants unimproved land, contending the disputed strip is part of the realty they purchased from the plaintiffs although not described in the contract and deed. The trial court decreed reformation of the legal description of the subject realty in the contract and deed to include the disputed strip and awarded defendants attorney fees. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

We review de novo on the record. ORS 19.125(3). It is well established…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. CALDWELL ET UX v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lewis v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Hardwick v. Dravo Equipment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kontz v. B. P. John Furniture Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Pioneer Resources, LLC v. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Hagenbuch v. ChapinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Mendieta v. STATE, DIVISION OF STATE LANDSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Co-Gen Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Soursby v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API