Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Kroeker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 13, 1984No. 55,177PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Prager, J.:

This is an action for a declaratory judgment brought by the plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), against its insured, the defendant, Peggy Kroeker, to determine State Farm’s right to subrogation or reimbursement for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits previously paid to the defendant under its automobile insurance policy for funeral and survivors’ benefits.

The pertinent facts in the case are not greatly in dispute and essentially are as follows: On April 1,1978, defendant’s husband, Glen E. Kroeker,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  3. Blaylock v. Georgia Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Russell v. MacKeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Pfeffer v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kilner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Chamberlain v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  3. Ellis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Nazar v. Allstate Insurance (In Re Veazey)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  5. Ellis v. WhittakerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API