Legal Opinion
Ellis v. Whittaker
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided November 27, 1985No. 57,225PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lorentz, J.:
Appellant Jack Ellis appeals from the trial court’s denial of a motion to modify judgment. The facts are not in issue and are briefly summarized here. .
Ellis was a pedestrian who received severe injuries when struck by an automobile driven by Horace Whittaker. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company provided insurance for both Ellis and Whittaker. Suit was filed and the full amount of Whittaker’s liability coverage of $25,000 was paid into Thomas County District Court. Ellis was paid $61,251.21 in personal injury protection (PIP) benefits on his own policy.
State Farm…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- LUIS MARTINEZ-McBEAN, Appellant v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- L. C. Collins and Lucille Collins, His Wife Earl Schneider and Mildred Schneider, His Wife v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Ellie Marie Parks and Willis Eugene Parks v. U. S. Life and Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Consolidated Gas & Equipment Company of America v. Clarence F. Carver and La Junta Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ellis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Collins v. Sandy City Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- Robert v. Fleetwood Motorhomes of California, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- Cosgrove v. Kansas State Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- Knowles v. FLEETWOOD MOTORHOMES OF CAL.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008