Legal Opinion

Russell v. MacKey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 31, 1979No. 50,153PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Prager, J.:

This is a dispute between an insured and her no-fault insurance carrier over the subrogation rights of the insurance company for PIP benefits paid, where the insured had recovered damages for her personal injuries by a settlement and judgment from a third-party tortfeasor. The facts in the case are undisputed and are as follows: Plaintiff-appellee, Maxine Russell, was injured in an automobile accident on September 9, 1976. Plaintiff was paid $2,552 by the intervenor-appellant, Hartford Insurance Company, as personal injury protection (PIP)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Nitchals v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Timmerman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Ballweg v. Farmers InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KroekerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Chamberlain v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API