Russell v. MacKey
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Prager, J.:
This is a dispute between an insured and her no-fault insurance carrier over the subrogation rights of the insurance company for PIP benefits paid, where the insured had recovered damages for her personal injuries by a settlement and judgment from a third-party tortfeasor. The facts in the case are undisputed and are as follows: Plaintiff-appellee, Maxine Russell, was injured in an automobile accident on September 9, 1976. Plaintiff was paid $2,552 by the intervenor-appellant, Hartford Insurance Company, as personal injury protection (PIP)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Nitchals v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Timmerman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
3Cited by18 opinions
- Crawford v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Ballweg v. Farmers InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KroekerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Chamberlain v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
- Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.