Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hall v. Cook

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 14, 1966No. 51598PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYDE, Judge.

Original proceeding in prohibition to prevent the respondent Judge from requiring relators to answer certain interrogatories. Relators are partners in the operation of a limestone quarry and were sued by August and Bernadine Wassman (hereinafter called plaintiffs) for $40,000.00 actual damages and $50,000.00 punitive damages, alleging injuries to their property and personal damages and discomfort from the operation of relators’ quarry.

The issue raised by relators is whether respondent Judge exceeded his jurisdiction in requiring relators to answer the following interrogatories…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. Neal v. Curtis & Co. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. RothCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitehead & Kales Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Embrey v. HollyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Mills v. MurrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API