Legal Opinion
Ulrich v. City of Crosby
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 18, 1994No. Civ. 5-92-208PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a general assignment, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), upon the Plaintiffs Motion for leave to amend her Complaint, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 549.191 and 549.20, so as to allege a claim for punitive damages against each of the Defendants, 1 and upon the Plaintiffs Motion for an Order compelling discovery against the Defendant Ralph LaPlant (“LaPlant”).
At a Hearing on the Motions, the Plaintiff…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Berczyk v. Emerson Tool Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Williamson v. PrasciunasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- DeRoche v. All American Bottling Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Target Corp. v. LCH Pavement Consultants, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.