Andrews v. Robertson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Clinton G. Dodge, and Fitzgerald, Abbott & Beardsley, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is an action for foreclosure of two mortgages. Plaintiff prevailed, the judgment decreeing a sale of the mortgaged premises, and the docketing of judgment for any deficiency after application of the proceeds of the sale, against several of the defendants, including defendant Mann. Said Mann appealed both from the judgment, and from the subsequent docketing by the clerk of a deficiency judgment against him.
There is no force whatever in the contention of learned counsel for respondent that the transcript prepared and settled by the trial judge under the provisions of section 953a of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ward v. De OcaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Ewing v. Richvale Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- White v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Case v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Mottashed v. Central & Pacific Improvement Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Gursky v. RosenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.