Legal Opinion

Case v. Egan

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1922No. Civ. No. 3852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment against the plaintiff, following an order sustaining a general demurrer to the amended complaint without leave to amend after the plaintiff had declined to amend.

The complaint alleges, in substance: On August 4, 1913, Claude Scheelk made and delivered to George W. Austin his promissory note for $1,450, secured by deed of trust to certain real property; that the said note was assigned by said Austin to Case, the plaintiff here; that there has been a default in the payment thereof when due; that the real property conveyed by said deed of trust was transferred by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Williams v. NaftzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Page v. W. W. Chase Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Alvord v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Robson v. O'TooleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Somers v. AvantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Mottashed v. Central & Pacific Improvement Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Pratt v. HopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API