Case v. Egan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This appeal is from a judgment against the plaintiff, following an order sustaining a general demurrer to the amended complaint without leave to amend after the plaintiff had declined to amend.
The complaint alleges, in substance: On August 4, 1913, Claude Scheelk made and delivered to George W. Austin his promissory note for $1,450, secured by deed of trust to certain real property; that the said note was assigned by said Austin to Case, the plaintiff here; that there has been a default in the payment thereof when due; that the real property conveyed by said deed of trust was transferred by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Williams v. NaftzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Page v. W. W. Chase Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Alvord v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Robson v. O'TooleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Somers v. AvantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Mottashed v. Central & Pacific Improvement Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Pratt v. HopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.