Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Richvale Land Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1917No. Sac. No. 2553PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. H. D. Gregory, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

A judgment of foreclosure was entered on February 25,1916, and an appeal was taken on April 29, 1916. That appeal has been dismissed on motion of appellant. The judgment was on two promissory notes each for $4,593', and by it a sale of the premises covered by the mortgage was ordered, but there was no express provision for the docketing of any deficiency. The property was sold for five thoúsand dollars; a return showing this fact was filed; and on April 22, 1916, the clerk docketed a deficiency judgment against appellant in the sum of $6,617.30. On April 24, 1916, Richvale Land Company…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Merced Bank v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Scamman v. BonslettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Page v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. In re BullockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Faias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Petroleum Midway Co. v. ZahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Andrews v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API