Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Welfare of JM

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1998No. C6-96-2365PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Justice.

Almost three years ago, Hennepin County Department of Children and Family Services filed a petition to terminate appellant Frances Michaud’s parental rights to her three youngest children: son J.M., daughter J.M., and son M.M. After several hearings and complex negotiations attempting to reunite the family, the juvenile court ordered from the bench that the children be placed in long-term foster care so that Michaud could continue to have supervised visits even though she was not capable of parenting them effectively. Hennepin County filed a motion for reconsideration,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. In Re the Welfare of J.J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. In Re the Marriage of CieslukSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.W.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. In Re the Welfare of P.R.L.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API