Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.W.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 22, 2004No. A03-262PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

Following a contested hearing, the district court terminated appellant R.W.’s1 *52parental i-ights to two children he had by K.K. based on findings that (1) appellant had abandoned the children; (2) appellant had substantially, continuously or repeatedly neglected to comply with the duties imposed upon him by the parent and child relationship; (3) reasonable efforts had failed to correct the conditions leading to the out-of-home placement; and (4) the children were neglected and in foster care. See Minn.Stat. § 260C.301, subd. l(b)(l)-(2), (5), (8) (2002). The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Hennepin County Welfare Department v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Matter of Welfare of JMSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. In Re the Welfare of P.R.L.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. In Re the Welfare of L.A.F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.E.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF R.D.L. and J.W., ParentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. In Re the Children of T.A.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API