In Re the Marriage of Ciesluk
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
In this post-dissolution proceeding between Michelle A. Ciesluk (Mother) and Christopher J. Ciesluk (Father), Mother appeals the trial comí; order denying her motion to modify parenting time pursuant to section 14-10-129, C.R.S. (2004). We hold that section 14-10-129, as amended, eliminates the three-part test set forth in In re Marriage of Francis, 919 P.2d 776, 784-85 (Colo.1996), including the presumption in favor of the majority time parent who is seeking to relocate. Instead, both parents share equally the burden of demonstrating what is in the child’s best interests. Ultimately, it is…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Spahmer v. GulletteSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Baxendale v. RaichIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Jeffrey R. Arnott v. Paula a/k/a Polly A. ArnottWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Jaime Taormina Bisbing v. Glenn R. Bisbing, III (077533) (Sussex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.