Legal Opinion
Rubin v. Los Angeles Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 1984No. Civ. 33296PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal by defendant Los Angeles Federal Savings Bank (Los Angeles Federal), formerly Los Angeles Federal Savings and Loan Association, from a judgment granting an injunction prohibiting Los Angeles Federal from enforcing the due-on-sale clause contained in a deed of trust affecting the property owned by plaintiff Gerald Rubin.
Facts
In 1964 Los Angeles Federal made a $359,000 loan to the Dial Construction Company. The loan was used to finance Dial’s purchase of a 34-unit apartment complex in San Bernardino and was secured by a deed of trust containing a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Crest Catering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Johnson v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Hoch v. Allied-Signal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Alling v. Universal Manufacturing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Nielsen v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.