Legal Opinion

Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1990No. Docket Nos. A040995, A042205PublishedCited by 52 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

*8Opinion

CHANNELL, J.

Appellant Barbara A. Luck, a computer programmer employed by appellant Southern Pacific Transportation Company, was fired when she refused to submit a urine sample as part of an unannounced drug test by her employer. At trial, the jury awarded Luck $485,042 on her claims of wrongful termination, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Southern Pacific appeals (case No. A040995), contending that (1) the federal Railway Labor Act preempts Luck’s claims; (2) the state constitutional right to privacy does not…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Stein v. Davidson Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Robert Landon v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API