Legal Opinion

City of Colorado Springs v. Kitty Hawk Development Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 4, 1964No. 20615PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

Defendant in error, Kitty Hawk Development Company, hereinafter designated as plaintiff or Kitty Hawk, instituted this action against the plaintiff in error, City of Colorado Springs, hereinafter designated as defendant or City, to recover the sum of $25,378.08 paid by it to the City. It alleged that the payment was made pursuant to Section 2E (1) of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, No. 1987, as amended and that the said section was unconstitutional, specifying numerous grounds therefor. Trial was to the court and at the conclusion thereof the court rendered judgment for plaintiff in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. City of Phoenix v. KasunArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. City of Englewood v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  5. Mayor, Etc., of New York v. . SonnebornNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Brookeville Turnpike Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Child v. City of Spanish ForkUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Forest City v. City of OregonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Town of Superior v. Midcities Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API