Legal Opinion
Town of Superior v. Midcities Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 17, 1997No. 95SC687PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
Section 112 of the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965 (Annexation Act) makes it unlawful for a municipality to impose “additional terms and conditions” upon the annexation of a landowner’s property, unless it obtains the landowner’s approval. § 31-12-112(1), 12B C.R.S. (1986). We must decide in this case whether the Town of Superior (Superior) acted in excess of its authority or abused its discretion when it acted to annex a landowner’s property contrary to a preanne-xation agreement in a particular consensual annexation. 1 The Boulder County District Court found there was an agreement between…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bertrand v. Board of County Commissioners of Park CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- City of Englewood v. DailySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- City of Colorado Springs v. Kitty Hawk Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of Greenwood VillageColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Anheuser Busch, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of AuroraColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.