Legal Opinion
Forest City v. City of Oregon
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 3, 1978No. KCD 29559PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASSERSTROM, Judge.
Forest City filed suit against the City of Oregon in three counts. The first two counts sought equitable relief against an increase in water rates, while the third count sought condemnation of certain fire hydrants. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss as to the first two,1 and ruled that judgment separate and final for purposes of appeal. Forest City appeals from that judgment. Counsel for Oregon have filed no brief nor made any appearance in this court, thereby increasing the difficulty of dealing with this appeal. We nevertheless affirm.
The parties have…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- City of Phoenix v. KasunArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Lock HavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Adkisson v. OzmentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- State Ex Rel. City of Sikeston v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mitchell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- City of Sullivan v. Truckstop Restaurants, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- City of Hamilton v. Public Water Supply District 2 of Caldwell CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Coursen v. City of SarcoxieMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- West Capital Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.