Legal Opinion
Landon v. Ginzton
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 24, 1954No. Patent Appeal 6006PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
Landon, the junior party, has appealed here from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding to appel-lees, Ginzton and Salisbury, the senior party, priority of the invention defined by the two counts in issue.
The interference involved appellees’ application No. 102,276, filed June 30, 1949, as a division of their parent application No. 474,016 previously filed January 29, 1943, which date stands in the interference as appellees’ date of record effective for conception and reduction to practice.
Appellees’ parent application…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Bowers v. ValleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Harris v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1925
- Pines v. McAllisterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Triplett v. SteinmayerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. TrevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Joshua C. Conner v. George G. JorisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- James F. Gordon v. Burton F. Hubbard and Gaynard H. FosdickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Wiesner v. WeigertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Edgar M. Creamer, Jr. v. Loren R. Kirkwood and Alton J. TorreCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.