Legal Opinion
Salafia v. Trust Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided September 14, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P.J.
This is a G.L.c. 90, §34M action to recover Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) payments for chiropractic services provided by the plaintiff to three individuals injured in accidents involving vehicles insured by defendant Trust Insurance Co. (‘Trust”). After a bench trial, judgment was entered for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C.
At issue in this case is a type of medical or chiropractic service caked “Manipulation.” Medical services are categorized by the American Medical Association by numbered Current Procedural Terminologies…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sanabia v. Travelers Insurance Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Nhem v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
- Chiappetta v. LyonsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Goldberg v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992
- Back Bay Travel Agency, Inc. v. BennettMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Salafia v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Boehm v. Premier InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
- New England Sports Therapy, Inc. v. Metlife Auto & HomeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
- N.E. Physical Therapy Plus, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011