Legal Opinion
Amari v. Amica Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided April 17, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A, Rule 8C, appeal of the summary judgment entered against the plaintiff-medical provider on his G.L.c. 90, §34M claim for unpaid Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits.
The record indicates that on December 8, 1999, Thomas Coakley (“Coakley”) sustained injuries in an automobile accident while driving a motor vehicle insured by defendant Arnica Mutual Insurance Company (“Arnica”). Coakley received chiropractic treatment for his injuries from the plaintiff, Dr. Samuel Amari (“Amari”). Arnica ordered Coakley to undergo an “independent medical examination”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Scalia v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
- Revere Chiropractic & Rehabilitation v. Concord Group InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- Shah v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- Essex Chiropractic Office, LLC v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Norfolk & Dedham GroupMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
- Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Premier Insurance Co. of MassachusettsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Duffy v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013