Dominguez v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
We are concerned in this case with an interpretation of personal injury protection (PIP) coverage, G. L. c. 90, § 34A, the no-fault motor vehicle insurance law. The question is whether, under the last paragraph of § 34A, an automobile insurer must pay for medical expenses between $2,000 and $8,000 as PIP benefits, if the claimant’s health insurer would have covered the medical services had the claimant sought *113treatment in accordance with his health insurer’s plan. We conclude that the automobile insurer is not required to make such payments.
The facts are undisputed. On March 23, 1994, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Mailhot v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Chipman v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Golchin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Mejia v. American Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Norfolk & Dedham GroupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Ortiz v. Examworks, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.